The above diagram represents the cross section of a reaction
structure, the concrete enclosure in which these technologies are
tested for either blast resistance or glass hazard mitigation
on a
blast
testing
range. This structure contains a window mounted in a
test frame (gray panel shown on left) on one wall with a "witness
panel" on the opposite wall of the structure.
The witness panel is constructed of foam covered with paper to
record any fragments of glass that may strike the back wall during
the test. The window, if designed to be blast resistant, or the
related glass hazard mitigation technology attached to the window
is tested.
A blast from an explosive charge is set off from a standardized
distance to create a pre-defined blast pressure for a pre-determined
duration (shown on far left).
When the
air
blast
impacts
the
window the
resulting damage is measured and recorded. The criteria
shown in the table below describes the response of the window after
the blast. If the window
fails and
glass is blown into the structure the resulting speed
and trajectory of the fragments are recorded by how far away from
the frame they fall or how high they may have impacted the witness
panel.
If the glass does not shatter and is not affected by the blast
(ex. Blast Windows) the resulting technology is given a rating of
1.
If the glass
cracks but
does not release from its frame the resulting technology is given
a rating of 2.
If the glass breaks and is contained within a distance of less
than 3.3 ft. from the front wall then it is given a rating of 3a.
If the glass
breaks and is contained within a distance of more
than 3.3 ft. and less than 10 ft. from the front wall and does
not impact the witness panel then it is given
a rating of 3b.
If
the glass breaks and the fragments perforate the witness panel
(10 ft from the front wall) under
2 ft. from the floor it
is given a rating of 4.
If
the glass breaks and the fragments perforate the witness panel
(10 ft from the front wall) above 2 ft. from
the floor it is given a rating of 5.
All technologies that achieve either a rating of 1, 2, 3a or 3b
are considered viable blast resistant or glass hazard mitigation
technologies depending on their application. It is important to note
that only a certified blast engineering company can define the
appropriate technology for a given application. Concentric Security's business
partner, Applied Research
Associates, Inc., can provide these necessary
consulting services through the Concentric Security
GSA Schedule (GS-07F-0100M,
listed under Intellimar, Inc.).
|